Making Choice Personal

There are two potential ways that a person may access and utilize decentralized technology. One is gaining approval for conduct by using pre-set centralized service offerings. The other is an independent use of decentralized technologies with assistance from centralized organizations sought if and when deemed necessary.
Even democratic centralized institutions [181] can either; i. assist in formulating and or facilitating a collaborative engagement under their central regulations or; ii. deal with the repercussions within their jurisdiction of an already enacted collaboration. We enable the other.
To re-state this, through nonpareil development of a self-organizing, secured, collaboration dependent engagement creation Biosphere we have formulated a double-blind, member-assured decentralized solution whereby customary financial transactions undergo stop-gap annexation. Incorporating blockchain security, amongst others, we act as decentralized facilitators and guarantors. A priori centralized 3rd party intermediary control in collaboration formulation or formalization is translated into potentially self-selected, ad hoc assistance as autonomously enrolled by participants.
Utilizing Humation's novel asynchronous crypto-corroborate wherein internationally transferable settlements are self-chosen from a basket of options, real world ownership is blockchain secured as well as monetarily guaranteed. Defining risk exposure [182] whilst operating in adherence with all centralized financial regulations and legal stipulations, the RWSC® methodology allows collaboration payments to be implemented globally in any currency and settled either by traditional exchanges or using cryptocurrency. Piggybacking the RWSC® system members may purchase time-stamped blockchain verification to media-content with associated intellectual rights ascribed accordingly.
The abstracted irony of a centrally enabled, decentralized collaboration network is not lost on us. However we feel this has been sufficiently resolved through i. specification of digital services as engagement facilitation and blockchain registration with no control over content nor collaborative completion; ii. limitation of payment exchange as firstly purely optional and secondly transferable between members; iii. zero artificial intelligence collating user data, amongst other privacy guarantees and; iv. the Real-World Smart Contract® as a member controlled decentralized, asynchronous crypto-corroborate.
Mainstream debates and reporting around decentralized technologies, including cryptocurrencies, often entirely miss the point. A most incredible reality now facing the planet is that, for the first time, open definitions of assets in collaborations can be used as guaranteed methods of decentralized exchange absent centralized control, restriction and or collective influence. Tangible value, payment actually exchanged in any form, individually may be legally bound to and solely determined between collaborative participants.
It is no longer a question of what value the centralized currency you hold is said to have. In its place this becomes what value do you wish to provide or secure. It is the first decentralized, global trusted barter coordination in history. The extent and implications of this can be said to be entirely up to your imaginations.